home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
rock_txt.cxt
/
00440_Text_re27t.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1997-02-04
|
2KB
|
70 lines
A second reason is that lawful
processes of perception must
have evolved to allow us to
achieve veridicality. An animal
can hardly be expected to find
out about what is actually
present or happening in the
world by asking someone or by
reading a book. Nor can it wait
to find out by exploring the
situation. Perception must be
capable of yielding accurate
information immediately and
through the senses. It is
understandable that the laws of
perception that allow us to gain
such information will also,
under certain conditions, lead
to misperception. We can
hardly expect such lawful
processes to be suspended
simply because we find out
that, for example, two lines
that we perceive to be unequal
in length are in fact equal or
that the moon, which we
perceive to be larger at the
horizon, is in fact equal in size
and distance from us whatever
its position in the night sky.
Still another reason for the
insulation of perception from
conceptually based knowledge
may be this: Perception is
sometimes based on inference
from rules, but the rules seem
to be "known" on an
unconscious level. For
example, it is probable that the
perceptual system "knows" the
law of the visual angle, that
the visual angle is inversely
proportional to an objectΓÇÖs
distance. This law is invoked
and employed unconsciously
when it enters into the
processing of size at some
distance. Therefore, the
process underlying perception
will run its course on the basis
of unconscious "knowledge"; it
is thus not influenced by
consciously available
information. Consequently,
when one inspects oneΓÇÖs own
afterimage projected on
surfaces at differing distances,
it matters little that one
consciously knows it is an
image of unchanging size. It
will still appear to change its
size because of the unconscious
application of the corollary of
the law of the visual angle,
EmmertΓÇÖs law, that the size of
objects yielding a constant
visual angle is directly
proportional to their distance.